Today I’m excited to say we have A. D. Garrett on the blog talking to us about her first draft process.
A.D. Garrett is the pseudonym for the writing collaboration between Dagger award-winning novelist, Margaret Murphy, and forensic scientist, Dave Barclay. Everyone Lies, published in 2013 to wide acclaim, was their first collaboration. The sequel, Believe No One, has just been released in paperback.
Margaret Murphy has published nine psychological thrillers under her own name – in the UK and the USA, as well as in translation across Europe. She has been shortlisted for the First Blood award for crime fiction, and for the Crime Writers’ Association (CWA) Dagger in the Library; in 2012 she was joint winner of the Short Story Dagger. A former Chair of the CWA and founder of Murder Squad, she lectures on writing and is RLF Writing Fellow at The University of Chester.
Dave Barclay was a senior lecturer at Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen from 2006-2013 and is an Honorary Professor in the Dept of Chemistry at Hull University. He was Head of Physical Evidence at the UK National Crime and Operations Faculty for 10 years, where he undertook physical evidence reviews in 233 murders or murder series.
When you decide to write something new, what is the first thing you do?
Buy an A4, wide rule Pukka pad and make sure I have plenty of Pilot gel pen refills available. It’s not superstition – they’re reasonably priced, but with a good paper density so it doesn’t blot the gel ink. As for the pens: they have a thick barrel and a soft grip, which makes for more comfortable writing.
Do you have a set routine approaching it?
Since I started collaborating with a forensic scientist on the Fennimore & Simms series, I work up a detailed outline, revising and augmenting that until I feel the story and characters have enough depth before embarking on the writing proper.
Pen and paper or straight to the keyboard?
Both. I sometimes find that the computer screen can be a barrier to creativity, and if I start feeling that way, I’ll retire to my comfy chair with a pen and pad.
How important is research to you?
Paramount – and not just because the forensic science has to be right. I’ve written nine psychological thrillers under my own name (Margaret Murphy) and right from the off, I did a lot of research. It provides new possibilities by introducing you to situations you couldn’t have imagined, to characters you would not have met sitting at your computer keyboard. Talking to an insider may give you that gem of information which sparks a new way to subvert the evidence, confounding the expectations of your readers and keeping them guessing.
How do you go about researching?
I read – forensic and psychological texts, as well as case studies. There is also a lot of reliable information online if you know where to look – government publications that would have cost a fortune in the past can now be downloaded free, and ACPO and police forces will often have advisory documents and reports available on the Web. Google can be a good source if approached with caution and carefully cross-referenced. But that’s only the start of it. For the first two A.D. Garretts, I called on the expertise of forensic expert Dave Barclay. For future novels I will be working with Helen Pepper, scientific consultant on both the Vera and Shetland TV series, senior lecturer in Policing, and a former CSI and Crime Scene Manager. UK policing is going through major changes, and it will be exciting to have someone who can talk me through them as they happen. Change means conflict, and conflict is great for story!
How do you store everything; ideas, research, images that catch your eye?
Handwritten scrawl and WORD docs cluttered with web links, plus sketches and mindmaps when things get complicated. For Believe No One I had to mindmap the levels of access to the US DNA database (CODIS) – it’s very different from the UK’s DNADB. I also printed out Google maps for each stage of Interstate 44, flagging body dump sites – and I stuck a grid of the victims and details of their last known movements to a cupboard door in my office. I take lots location photos, though never enough – I’m often too busy absorbing the feel of the place to take shots of what it looks like.
Tell us how that first draft takes shape?
It’s different for each book, but there will always be an outline – the A.D. Garrett outlines involve close consultation with my collaborator who will approve or suggest changes and improvements to the scientific/procedural content. I don’t always write in sequence: if a scene is particularly powerful in my mind, I might write it almost in full, with dialogue and action. Writing Believe No One I followed one character’s story almost to the end of the book, leaving all others aside, and only breaking off when he had to begin interacting with others whose stories hadn’t yet been fully realised. That was a first for me, but I found the process so satisfying I might try it again with book 3 in the Fennimore & Simms series.
Are there any rituals you have to do or items you must have with you while writing that draft?
No, all I need is time and some peace and quiet.
Does the outside world exist or are you lost to us for a period of time as the magic works?
The reality for most writers is that we need to supplement our writing earnings – check out the Authors’ Licensing and Collecting Society’s report ‘What Are Words Worth Now?’ for more on that. So I teach. I am RLF Writing Fellow at the University of Chester, and in January I’ll be teaching creative writing at MMU. I have to fit in social media, writing articles, updating my website – and running a household, too. That said, when the writing is going well I can easily lose a few hours in my created world.
What does your work space look like?
More or less messy, depending on whether I’ve had a blitz. Notes laid out on the window ledge and desk (really two desks pushed together – I was a biology teacher in my previous life, and I like plenty of ‘bench’ space); dictionary; thesaurus; two lamps (like I said BIG desk). I also have a comfy chair for when the computer raises that writing barrier (technically, it’s a chaise longue, but so small it could fit in your pocket); post-its in a range of colours… There’s a picture…
Edit as you go or just keep getting words out?
Edit as I go. Usually, I will read over the scene or (rarely) the chapter I wrote the previous day, edit and then continue with the next section. It’s actually a good way to ease into the writing, it keeps me in touch with story, tone and style, and the beautiful lines I preened myself over the previous day reveal themselves as narcissistic gargoyles. When I think a scene is ready, I’ll read it to my husband.
I see many writers counting words in a day. Word counter or other method of keeping track of progression?
I do word count, on occasions. But it’s only a good thing when you’re writing well over the 500 mark every day – otherwise it’s demoralising. I do try to write every day, though – despite the teaching schedule. Often I’ll edit if I’ve only an hour to spare.
So, that first draft is down. Roughly how long did it take? And what shape is it in?
The Murphy novels take about 9-12 months, but for the A.D. Garrett novels it’s more like 18 months. Hopefully, because I’ve been continuously editing, it won’t be too horrible. But it will be too long, and so I’ll try to edit it down by at least 10% – probably more.
In what format do you like to read it through, ereader, paper or the computer screen?
Paper – always. Psychological tests have shown that we read more slowly, less accurately, and find fewer errors when reading on-screen – and we tire more easily. So it’s a no-brainer, really.
What happens now that first draft is done?
I set it aside for a couple of weeks (it should be more, but deadlines are a beast). Then I’ll read through as far as I can without putting it down, which can bring on symptoms very like seasickness. So I take breaks – but I’ll read the story and only the story in that time. I’ll jot down notes and corrections in the margins, but won’t stop to type them up until I’ve finished the read-through. When the ‘final’ edit is done, I send it to my agent. That is the hardest part, because it means letting go, and there’s always more to be done.
Thanks for digging into the depths of the first draft. It’s been a pleasure having you.
It’s been fun – thanks for asking me!
You can find A.D. Garrett on Twitter, her Amazon author page, and her Margaret Murphy Amazon author page.
Believe No One
Forensic expert Professor Nick Fennimore has engineered lectures in Chicago and St Louis – a ploy to get to Detective Chief Inspector Kate Simms. She’s in the United States on sabbatical with St Louis PD, and he’s keen to see her again. Simms is working with a ‘method swap’ team, reviewing cold cases, sharing expertise. But Simms came to the US to escape the fallout from their previous case – the last thing she needs is Fennimore complicating her life.
A call for help from a sheriff’s deputy in Oklahoma seems like a welcome distraction for the professor – until he hears the details: a mother dead, her child gone – echoes of Fennimore’s own tragedy.
Nine-year-old Red, adventuring in Oklahoma’s backwoods, has no clue that he and his mom are in the killer’s sights. Back in St Louis, investigators discover a pattern: victims – all of them young mothers – dumped along a 600 mile stretch of I-44. The Oklahoma and St Louis investigations converge, uncovering serial murders across two continents and two decades. Under pressure, the killer begins to unravel, and when a fresh body surfaces, the race is on to catch the I-44 killer and save the boy.
Margot Kinberg says
Rebecca – I’m so glad you’re continuing this feature. I think it’s great.
Margaret – Thanks for sharing how you go about planning your stories. I couldn’t agree with you more about the importance of research when it comes to writing; I think it’s critical. Wishing you much continued success.
M.H. Vesseur says
The effort Margareth Murphy puts into research before the writing is impressive. I can see this is necessary for these kinds of novels: if a forensic scientist collaborates, one needs a solid preparation of both story and the requested knowledge of forensic science. With the pictures in this blog post her room looks almost like a crime scene: all the details of corpses and locations and people are pinned to the wall! Does Margareth Murphy have a sign on her door that says “Everything in this room is fictional”, just in case some official comes in and mistakes this information for a psycho killer’s archive?
I am impressed by all the thoroughness. Collaborating with experts must be time consuming, but Mrs. Murphy seems to be practical about the amount of time the first draft needs, up to 18 months in this particular case. I find that inspiring; to take the time for it and avoid being rushed.
One thing in particular stood out for me: the writing of one character’s story separately from the others, almost to the end of the book. A stand alone exercise that is very intriguing. I’ve never tried something like that, but I can see it could have a special charm for the author.
Reblogged this on Pam Plumb and commented:
Super post and insight from great writer Margaret Murphy
Wow! She’s so organised! Some really insightful answers there, with lots of useful tips for any aspiring crime writers (that’ll be quite a few of us – in Margot’s case, that’s a REAL crime writer!) Thanks to Margaret for giving such great, detailed answers. I have the first AD Garrett, so I must get round to it. And I love the chaise longue!
Jacqui Murray says
You make a good point–about computers and creativity. I do everything at the computer and often moan about my lack of creativity. Relationship? Hmm…